Jump to content


Photo

Hudson h9. .. seems like a cool story


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 slink

slink

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,192 posts
  • LocationWA

Posted 18 November 2017 - 05:32 PM

https://youtu.be/g1LNq1x7-5E

#2 Cranky Gunsmith

Cranky Gunsmith

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 335 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 10:16 PM

Is it production legal?

#3 ToddKS

ToddKS

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,342 posts
  • LocationGetting killed in the streets

Posted 18 November 2017 - 10:51 PM

It is under review for adjustment.

#4 Alfred Salveti

Alfred Salveti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts
  • LocationSugar City, USA

Posted 19 November 2017 - 01:08 AM

Is it production legal?


They are working with FN to get their production numbers up and Cajun Gun work to ensure their parts satisfy the current adjustments.

I expect once the check clears the gun will be approved
  • warpspeed likes this

I am an inventor and Firearms Industry Subject Matter Expert. 


#5 peterthefish

peterthefish

    Banned.

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,919 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 01:33 AM

This gun is like a year behind schedule. If they ever actually sell some I plan to buy one.

#6 Peally

Peally

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,324 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 19 November 2017 - 01:54 AM

45 minute video on a handgun that isn't even available? Jeez.



#7 Alfred Salveti

Alfred Salveti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts
  • LocationSugar City, USA

Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:25 AM

This gun is like a year behind schedule. If they ever actually sell some I plan to buy one.

 
 

45 minute video on a handgun that isn't even available? Jeez.



http://www.gunbroker...=HUDSON&Sort=13

I am an inventor and Firearms Industry Subject Matter Expert. 


#8 aceinyerface

aceinyerface

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,092 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 06:34 AM

Every new gun needs to prove itself.

It is not on my radar until someone wins something big with it (indicating it has been well shot) or someone publishes a million round torture test.

#9 peterthefish

peterthefish

    Banned.

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,919 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 06:36 AM




http://www.gunbroker...=HUDSON&Sort=13


Fair enough. Given the delays in production I’m probably gonna wait until the experts at Pistol Forum weigh in.
  • MEISTERB likes this

#10 shreek

shreek

    Aberrant Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationNull Island

Posted 19 November 2017 - 09:36 AM

Bunch of good USPSA shooters & gunsmiths in their part of Texas. Monthly USPSA, IDPA and Steel matches in their town.

Pretty sure none of them have done anything with the H9 despite how highly touted it is for low recoil and fast followup shots.

I guess the Hudson people don't realize how cheap USPSA GMs work-- you can get lots of T&E for the price of a couple boxes of ammo.

Use the rules. Don't DQ someone who doesn't do anything DQable. -- Da Beard.

 


#11 GuanoLoco

GuanoLoco

    Minister of Culture

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,818 posts
  • LocationMy Safe Space

Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:14 AM

Bunch of good USPSA shooters & gunsmiths in their part of Texas. Monthly USPSA, IDPA and Steel matches in their town.
Pretty sure none of them have done anything with the H9 despite how highly touted it is for low recoil and fast followup shots.
I guess the Hudson people don't realize how cheap USPSA GMs work-- you can get lots of T&E for the price of a couple boxes of ammo.


You assume they actually want an honest assessment, and that their target market knows or cares what a USPSA GM’s opinion is.
Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Doodie Project?

You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

In Doodie, Veritas.

"You might be a little thin-skinned for this forum". -Scott.

#12 shreek

shreek

    Aberrant Freak

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationNull Island

Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:33 AM

You assume they actually want an honest assessment, and that their target market knows or cares what a USPSA GM’s opinion is.

Actually, I assume they don't based on their behavior.

Nobody cares about USPSA [United Stated Practical Shooting Association] anymore.

Back in the 80's when GoG [GuruOfGuns] was shooting, it was the cutting edge where all the cool shit was developed and tested and a big deal with factory teams all over the place.

Now it's a backwater the manufacturers would rather didn't exist because we keep breaking their stuff, embarrassing their pet gun-writer/reviewers at matches and using the warranties rather than shooting 12 rounds, declaring 'shoots good' and parking under the bed.

Of course the marketing department will trumpet 'flatter shooting' and 'faster followup shots' without even taking half a Saturday to go ask people that actually know about these things, yet the TFB [The Firearms Blog] nuthuggers will suck it all up and spew it back all over the internets.

Edited by shreek, 19 November 2017 - 01:56 PM.

  • Stubb, GuruOfGuns, NickBlasta and 2 others like this

Use the rules. Don't DQ someone who doesn't do anything DQable. -- Da Beard.

 


#13 Sad Sack

Sad Sack

    Forum Tard

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,061 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:44 AM

Whether you're into this gun or not, it's a mistake to discount the thinking that went into it.  The truth is that those capable of envisioning and building something like this are hard to find nowadays.  I don't think I'll buy one, but the dude deserves credit.



#14 aceinyerface

aceinyerface

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,092 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 11:39 AM

Actually, I assume they don't based on their behavior.
Nobody cares about USPSA anymore.
Back in the 80's GoG was shooting, it was the cutting edge where all the cool shit was developed and tested and a big deal with factory teams all over the place.
Now it's a backwater the manufacturers would rather didn't exist because we keep breaking their stuff, embarrassing their pet gun-writer/reviewers at matches and using the warranties rather than shooting 12 rounds, declaring 'shoots good' and parking under the bed.
Of course the marketing department will trumpet 'flatter shooting' and 'faster followup shots' without even taking half a Saturday to go ask people that actually know about these things, yet the TFB nuthuggers will suck it all up and spew it back all over the internets.


You assume people keep up with your alphabet soup.

In reality, no one knows what the fuck you are talking about.

#15 Stubb

Stubb

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,593 posts
  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 19 November 2017 - 12:06 PM

Nobody cares about USPSA anymore.

 

Getting endorsements from bearded dudes with full-sleeve tats and dubious military credentials is where it's at. 


  • lpc, Mistadobalina and GuruOfGuns like this

#16 Alfred Salveti

Alfred Salveti

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts
  • LocationSugar City, USA

Posted 19 November 2017 - 02:15 PM

This is a game changer in the market.  The first new "mouse trap" in about 30 years.  They don't need USPSA anymore than they need Pat Lamb or Larry Defoor to bless it.  There were enough people out there hoping for something new the buzz was already there for when it finally came along.

 

Should they give one to a GM along with coercing/favoring Federal to give the guy 20k rounds to go win matches and post on Instagram....yes.  Should they give one to Jack Mcmoon to take to his classes with a few cases of protein bars to excite the Timay's...yes as well.

 

Should be USPSA approved but I'm sure they've got to see how Sig, Smith, Glock and CZ feel about it first.  After all they ponied up $500 to put their banner on stage 5 and until Coke kicks in millions you've got to dance with the one that brung ya...


I am an inventor and Firearms Industry Subject Matter Expert. 


#17 Harry Palmer

Harry Palmer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 421 posts
  • LocationMilpenis, Ca.

Posted 19 November 2017 - 09:22 PM

Every new gun needs to prove itself.

It is not on my radar until someone wins something big with it (indicating it has been well shot) or someone publishes a million round torture test.

 

I won't be interested until it passes the Sig mallet/drop test!



#18 Sweet T

Sweet T

    Glock Master Race

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,431 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:31 PM

According to whoever runs their facebook page they intend to get some in the hands of USPSA types for T&E.



#19 Cranky Gunsmith

Cranky Gunsmith

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 335 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 10:34 PM

According to whoever runs their facebook page they intend to get some in the hands of USPSA types for T&E.

Has USPSA ever said no to a production request on a striker fired pistol?

#20 Peally

Peally

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,324 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 20 November 2017 - 07:59 AM

What reasoning would be behind saying no outside of it being a pistol that's stupidly rare?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users